Automotive components

Two-way sync and automation for automotive components.

Keep customer program commitments, release schedules, lot records and engineering cutovers traceable across business systems.

Commercial forecasts, firm releases and engineering revisions are copied between teams as if they authorize the same production decision.

Book a demo

Explore your process in a demo, or get our shared two-way sync architecture guide.

The platform, in operating order

Start with live data. Put it to work.

01

Two-way sync

Keep shared customer, order, and operational records aligned, with clear field ownership.

Explore two-way sync 02

Workflows

Move approved work between systems, assign exceptions, and confirm the result.

Explore workflows 03

AI agents (Genies)

Investigate cross-system questions, assemble the evidence, and prepare the next action.

Explore ai agents (genies) 04

EDI

Connect trading-partner documents to operational records and exception handling.

Explore edi

Built around your operations

For teams managing more than one business model

Supply-chain, quality and IT teams at US automotive component suppliers with 100–1,000 employees.

Engineering cutover coordination

Find open demand and inventory affected by an approved change and collect each owner’s disposition.

Explore workflows ↗

Supplier delay recovery

Map a component delay to firm commitments before approving expedited supply or revised dates.

Explore workflows ↗

Release exception assistant

Assemble evidence when customer releases differ from approved production commitments.

Explore Genies ↗

Your systems and records

Agree on ownership before automating actions

Record	Owner	Operating rule
Program award	Commercial operations	Keep estimated lifetime demand separate from an approved order or firm customer release.
Customer release	Production planning	Preserve customer, plant, part, period and revision in the demand identity.
Engineering cutover	Engineering and quality	Retain effective dates or serial/lot boundaries and the authorizing decision.
Shipment lot	Shipping and quality	Trace shipped quantities back to the relevant lot and revision without inferring acceptance from dispatch.

Salesforce NetSuite Dynamics 365 F&O SQL Server PostgreSQL Dynamics 365 F&O + SQL Server integration NetSuite + PostgreSQL integration

Use the partner’s agreed 850/860 process for orders and changes; treat forecasting and shipping schedules as separate message families.

Evaluate your next process

Find the right fit for your systems

Two-way syncDynamics 365 Finance and SQL Server two-way sync for automotive suppliers
Connect selected Dynamics records to an operational SQL Server view that keeps forecasts and firm releases distinguishable.
Two-way syncNetSuite and Postgres two-way sync for automotive component evidence
Connect NetSuite shipments and orders with the lot and revision evidence maintained in your operational Postgres application.
WorkflowsEngineering-cutover workflows for automotive component suppliers
Coordinate approved component revisions across open demand, existing stock and work in progress.
EDIEDI order and revision automation for automotive component suppliers
Connect agreed automotive EDI order and change processes to reviewable ERP demand.

Implementation and operating guides

Work through the details

Two-way syncAutomotive component suppliers: connect Salesforce program awards and NetSuite demand
Program identity can tie a Salesforce award to NetSuite customer, plant and part records while estimates, forecasts and accepted releases keep their own meaning.
Two-way syncAutomotive suppliers: separate firm releases and forecasts in Dynamics and SQL Server
A planning view that shows forecast, requested and accepted quantities side by side, with the accepted total explained from documented customer rules rather than a SQL sum.
Two-way syncAutomotive components: connect NetSuite shipments to Postgres lot evidence
Shipment evidence that answers which recorded lots supplied one NetSuite shipment line, reconciled by quantity and open about gaps in the Postgres record.
WorkflowsAutomotive component engineering cutovers: coordinate open demand and existing inventory
A cutover case shows the approved boundary, which releases and material fall inside it, and each owner’s disposition before the item master changes revision.
WorkflowsAutomotive supplier delays: build recovery plans around firm customer releases
A recovery case sizes the shortage against firm releases only, checks transfers and expedites already in place, and closes a quantity once it is usable.
AI agents (Genies)AI agents for automotive release review: assemble quantity, date and revision differences
The Genie assembles quantity, date and revision differences between a customer release update and current commitments so a planner can decide the next step.
AI agents (Genies)Automotive release AI exceptions: stale versions, plant mappings and part changes
When a late release file carries an old plant alias or a superseded part reference, the Genie shows which facts conflict and who has to confirm them.
EDIAutomotive component EDI 850 and 860: preserve firm orders and approved revisions
Original 850 orders, 860 change requests and partner responses stay traceable through replays, retries and engineering cutovers under the customer agreement.

Questions from automotive components teams

Who should own an automotive components pilot when forecasts, firm releases and revisions get treated as the same instruction?

Production planning should own it, since planning is the team that has to decide which Customer release is actionable. Commercial operations keeps the Program award and its lifetime estimate; engineering and quality keep the Engineering cutover and its effective boundary. Bring in the Dynamics 365 or NetSuite administrator before write permissions are granted. Two-way sync can carry each record to the team that needs it, but a forecast stays a forecast until planning accepts it as demand.

How do you tell whether an engineering cutover or a supplier delay is ready for workflow automation?

A cutover is ready when the Engineering cutover record carries an effective date or lot boundary and an authorizing decision, so the workflow can find the open demand and inventory it touches and ask each owner for a disposition. A supplier delay is ready when firm commitments are separate from forecasts, so the workflow can map the delay onto real Customer release lines. In both cases the workflow collects dispositions; expedited supply and revised dates are approved by planning, not by the workflow.

What should an automotive supplier see in an EDI and release exception demo?

Send a customer 850, an 860 change against it, and a forecast or shipping schedule from a different message family, then replay the 850. The demo should show two Customer release lines that stay separate, a change applied only to its target release, the forecast held as planning context rather than demand, and no duplicate after the replay. The release exception Genie prepares the planner’s review of any quantity or date difference; planning accepts or rejects the schedule. Two-way sync is a separate scope from EDI transport.

Bring one real process

See how your records and handoffs fit together.

Bring the systems, record types, and exceptions your team handles today. We’ll scope the connections and actions, then walk through the path to a confirmed result.