Electrical and electronic components

Two-way sync and automation for electrical and electronic components.

Connect configured assemblies, revision-sensitive component stock, distributor orders and substitution decisions across operational systems.

A component is available by part number but unsuitable for the required revision, approved manufacturer or customer configuration.

Book a demo

Explore your process in a demo, or get our shared two-way sync architecture guide.

The platform, in operating order

Start with live data. Put it to work.

01

Two-way sync

Keep shared customer, order, and operational records aligned, with clear field ownership.

Explore two-way sync 02

Workflows

Move approved work between systems, assign exceptions, and confirm the result.

Explore workflows 03

AI agents (Genies)

Investigate cross-system questions, assemble the evidence, and prepare the next action.

Explore ai agents (genies) 04

EDI

Connect trading-partner documents to operational records and exception handling.

Explore edi

Built around your operations

For teams managing more than one business model

Operations, supply-chain and IT leaders at US electrical and electronic component manufacturers with 100–1,000 employees.

Component substitution review

Gather specification and stock evidence for an engineering-approved alternative.

Explore workflows ↗

Distributor return reconciliation

Match returned quantities, serials or lots and disposition evidence before finance approves a credit.

Explore workflows ↗

Part-reference exception assistant

Identify missing cross-references and candidate matches while keeping component approval with engineering.

Explore Genies ↗

Your systems and records

Agree on ownership before automating actions

Record	Owner	Operating rule
Configured assembly	Application engineering	Keep approved options and customer requirements attached to the commercial order.
Component revision	Product engineering	Preserve the approved manufacturer part and permitted alternatives separately.
Allocation record	Supply-chain planning	Link committed stock to the demand line rather than relying on a pooled available quantity.
Distributor PO line	Customer service	Retain partner line identifiers, packaging units and requested dates across revisions.

Salesforce Acumatica NetSuite PostgreSQL Shopify Salesforce + Acumatica integration NetSuite + PostgreSQL integration

Validate distributor 850 orders and 860 changes against part cross-references, reel or tray units and revision-specific demand.

Evaluate your next process

Find the right fit for your systems

Two-way syncSalesforce and Acumatica two-way sync for electrical manufacturers
Connect accepted assembly quotes and customer requirements to Acumatica orders while preserving engineering-approved configuration.
Two-way syncNetSuite and Postgres two-way sync for electronic-component operations
Connect component identity, approved applicability and demand allocation across NetSuite and your Postgres operational application.
WorkflowsComponent-substitution workflows for electronics manufacturers
Bring shortages, candidate components and affected assemblies into a controlled engineering-review handoff.
EDIEDI order automation for electrical and electronic component manufacturers
Connect distributor EDI orders and revisions to the approved product, packaging and ERP model.

Implementation and operating guides

Work through the details

Two-way syncElectrical manufacturers: connect Salesforce assembly quotes to Acumatica orders
Keep the accepted configuration version on the Acumatica order and treat an option changed after approval as a separate decision that sales can see.
Two-way syncElectronic components: connect NetSuite and Postgres revision-aware stock allocation
Pooled item-family stock hides which orders are covered; link eligible supply to each demand line so planning sees the shortage on the restricted order.
Two-way syncElectrical components on Shopify: map NetSuite variants, packs and order quantities
Similar connector descriptions and a new pack size are where storefront orders go wrong; hold variant identity, item reference and conversion version per accepted order.
WorkflowsElectronic component substitutions: route evidence to engineering before changing supply
Purchasing finds an alternative and an old engineering note; the workflow shows which assembly revision that approval covers and asks engineering about the rest.
WorkflowsElectronic-component returns: reconcile distributor quantities, lots and credit decisions
Customer service, receiving and finance each hold a different return quantity; reconcile packs, pieces and lot evidence before anyone prepares a credit.
AI agents (Genies)AI agents for electronics order intake: resolve customer part references for review
Order lines with unknown customer part numbers get candidate matches, packaging notes and one precise open question instead of a guessed item.
AI agents (Genies)Electronics AI mapping exceptions: part suffixes, packaging units and revision restrictions
A shortened manufacturer number and five reels look easy to a generic matcher; the exception packet names the suffix, unit and approval gap the reviewer must settle.
EDIElectronic-component EDI 850 and 860: validate part references, reels and revisions
A revised part suffix and a reel unit with no conversion should stop a line for review, not become the closest item multiplied by a default count.

Questions from electrical and electronic components teams

Who should own an electronic components pilot when a part is in stock but wrong for the revision?

Supply-chain planning should own it, with product engineering as the approving partner. Planning holds the Allocation record and can show which stock is committed to which demand line; product engineering holds the Component revision and decides which manufacturer parts and alternatives are approved. Customer service joins for the Distributor PO line side. Two-way sync between NetSuite and Postgres can make the allocation and revision visible together, but approval of an alternative part stays with engineering.

When should component substitution review come before distributor return reconciliation as your first workflow?

Put substitution first when shortages are forcing planners to use an available part number without an engineering decision on the Component revision. The workflow gathers the specification and stock evidence and routes it to product engineering, which approves or rejects the alternative. Put returns first when credits are being approved before returned quantities, serials or lots have been matched to the original Distributor PO line. The workflow assembles that match and disposition evidence; finance keeps the credit decision.

What should an electronic components demo show for distributor EDI orders that fail part matching?

Send a distributor 850 with a customer reference that has no cross-reference, a line ordered in reels, and an 860 that changes quantity on a revision-specific line. The part-reference Genie should show candidate matches with their source evidence and ask product operations to approve the cross-reference; a similar description is not treated as a match. The accepted line keeps its Distributor PO line identifiers and packaging unit, and the change touches only its target line. Treat two-way sync and EDI transport as separate scopes with separate checks.

Bring one real process

See how your records and handoffs fit together.

Bring the systems, record types, and exceptions your team handles today. We’ll scope the connections and actions, then walk through the path to a confirmed result.