Salesforce 
HubSpot 
NetSuite 
Zendesk 
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Sales 
Dynamics 365 F&O 
Attio 
Pipedrive 
Zoho CRM 
Campfire 
Rillet 
Front 
Shopify 
Amazon Seller Central 
SendGrid Plan how Microsoft Dynamics 365 and Microsoft Graph should share data across your business. Work with Stacksync engineers on record mapping, system access, and the requirements for running the integration.
Proposed workflow
Planning example. Stacksync support for the required connection and record operations needs a technical review.
Starting eventA change involving Microsoft Dynamics 365 Contacts or Microsoft Graph Contacts needs a defined result in the other system.
Start with Microsoft Dynamics 365 Contacts and Microsoft Graph Contacts. Use the record-matching and field-ownership rules from your mapping worksheet.
Resolve the organization relationship and any owner or consent references required by the destination.
Test a normal update and one failed or repeated update in the supported direction. Keep both record IDs with the test results.
What to verifyTest an email change, two records sharing an email, and a person associated with multiple organizations.
Review records and field ownershipProposed record relationships
Use these examples to define record matching and field ownership for your technical review.
Download the mapping worksheetCSV · No email required
| Microsoft Dynamics 365 record | Microsoft Graph record | Record matching | Field ownership |
|---|---|---|---|
| ContactsProposed record; confirm Stacksync object support.Record matching | ContactsProposed record; confirm Stacksync object support. | Use a stable person/contact ID and an explicit cross-system lookup. Email can change and can be shared, so treat it as a matching clue rather than a universal key. | Keep consent and communication preferences under an agreed authority; a general contact update must not silently resubscribe someone. |
These relationships do not establish connector availability. Review the required connection and record operations with Stacksync.
Use documented coverage where available. Catalog record types are starting points for review and do not confirm Stacksync support.
Read and write support varies by record
Record types covered in the setup guide
| Record types | Coverage and requirements |
|---|---|
| Requires account access and compatible change tracking. Confirm field permissions and sync direction. |
| Requires API exposure and compatible change tracking. Confirm field permissions and sync direction. |
Connection and object support require review
Record types to review with Stacksync
| Record types | Coverage and requirements |
|---|---|
| Confirm support for this record type and the direction you need. |
Confirm Stacksync support and account requirements for undocumented connections. Interface information alone does not establish connector availability.
View setup requirements and limits| Connection requirement | Microsoft Dynamics 365 | Microsoft Graph |
|---|---|---|
| Integration interface | REST API (Dataverse Web API, OData v4); Finance & Operations apps expose a separate OData data-entity surface | Microsoft Graph unified REST API (v1.0 and beta) at graph.microsoft.com, spanning Microsoft 365 services — Entra ID, Outlook mail and calendar, OneDrive and SharePoint, Teams, and Planner; supports JSON $batch (up to 20 requests per call). |
| Authentication | Microsoft OAuth sign-in | Confirm the credentials, API plan, and permissions required for Microsoft Graph. |
| Change detection | Incremental sync uses Dynamics Change Tracking; custom entities need Track Changes enabled. | Confirm how Stacksync detects changes for this connector and the objects you need. |
| Read access | Available for supported records | Confirm with Stacksync |
| Write access | Available for supported records | Confirm with Stacksync |
Enterprise controls
As a data company, we understand the importance of keeping your data secure. Stacksync is built with security best practices to keep your data safe at every layer, and is DPF-certified for US, EU, UK and CH data transfers.
Let your users access Stacksync from your centralized user management systems. Works with Okta, Azure, Google SSO and more.
Immediately get alerted about record syncing issues over email, Slack, PagerDuty and WhatsApp. Resolve issues from a centralized dashboard with retry and revert options.
Securely connects to your systems with:
Inspect sync errors and use retry and revert controls to resolve failed updates.
Read the recovery guideImplementation
Review setup, record relationships, testing, and recovery for your implementation.
Documentation reviewed 2026-09-15. Check the linked guides for current account and record requirements.
Set up both accounts before testing the mapping. Use test records where available, and identify the account administrator who can approve access and help resolve setup errors.
Setup guides: Authorize Dynamics 365 CRM
Record the fields each system can update, the first-load cutoff, both record IDs, the expected update delay, and who handles errors. Complete the tests before production before expanding to more records.
Use the Microsoft Dynamics 365 and Microsoft Graph planning worksheet to capture these decisions. Record the access owner in the worksheet and enter credentials only in the connection setup.
Use these data-model references to describe the records your connection needs. They are planning examples; connector availability and supported operations must be established before implementation.
Download the mapping worksheet · CSV, no email required
Record matching
Compare whether Microsoft Dynamics 365 Contacts and Microsoft Graph Contacts describe the same contact in your business.
Planning example. Stacksync support for the required connection and record operations needs a technical review.
Fields to include
References: Microsoft Dynamics 365: Contacts documentation
Choose a method around one example record and the update your business needs. Use Contacts / Contacts to review record matching and confirm Stacksync support for the required operations. Compare ongoing sync, a custom workflow, and a scheduled export against that requirement.
Planning example. Stacksync support for the required connection and record operations needs a technical review.
Starting event: A change to the selected Contacts or Contacts record needs a defined result in the other system.
Expected result: Test an email change, two records sharing an email, and a person associated with multiple organizations.
If it fails: Hold ambiguous matches for review and reconcile the person ID before retrying; preserve the consent decision already recorded by its owner.
This is an evaluation scenario; connector and operation support require confirmation.
Starting event: A customer-facing change in Microsoft Dynamics 365 needs operational context in Microsoft Graph.
Expected result: The relationship survives a lifecycle change without creating a duplicate customer or triggering an unintended business action.
If it fails: Inspect merge/conversion history and existing destination records before replaying a lifecycle transition.
Keep both record IDs with the expected and actual result. Reconcile the same filters and time window in each system.
Test an email change, two records sharing an email, and a person associated with multiple organizations.
The expected contact relationship is preserved with no duplicate action or unintended write.
Bring an example source record and the intended destination operation to the compatibility review. Confirm the supported route before granting write access.
Only an approved, supported direction and permitted fields are written.
Measure source and destination times for the selected records under normal load and a burst. Reconcile IDs and values using the same filters and cutoff.
The process meets its agreed freshness target and reconciliation has no unexplained differences.
Start with the failed record and the destination error, then inspect the source value, field requirements, and access.
Inspect Microsoft Dynamics 365 Contacts and Microsoft Graph Contacts, their IDs, and the destination error.
Hold ambiguous matches for review and reconcile the person ID before retrying; preserve the consent decision already recorded by its owner.
Check the Microsoft Dynamics 365 and Microsoft Graph connector guides, account permissions, and any operations marked On Request.
Ask the integration team to confirm a supported way to handle that record. Verify whether it needs connector configuration or a separate workflow step.
Compare current source values, destination validation, identity mappings, and any side effects already completed.
Stacksync issue retry reads the current source state. Decide the intended state before retrying or reverting; reconcile downstream effects separately.
Read the Stacksync issues dashboard guide for retry and revert behavior.
See how each system detects changes and which updates the other system can receive. Each direction has its own permissions and record requirements.
Detect changesIncremental sync uses Dynamics Change Tracking; custom entities need Track Changes enabled.
Apply updatesConfirm that Stacksync can create or update the records you need in Microsoft Graph.
Detect changesConfirm how Stacksync detects changes for this connector and the objects you need.
Apply updatesConfirm that Stacksync can create or update the records you need in Microsoft Dynamics 365.
Explore a Microsoft Dynamics 365 and Microsoft Graph integration with a Stacksync engineer. Stacksync support for Microsoft Graph is not established by the connector documentation reviewed for this page. Start with one record and the update your business needs to identify an implementation path.
Confirm two-way support with Stacksync for the records and fields you need in both systems. Access to a vendor API does not confirm that its Stacksync connector supports write-back.
Measure initial-load and ongoing-change latency separately. Source detection, selected objects, account limits, and destination validation determine the observed delay.
No. Stacksync documents that pre-existing duplicates are not merged automatically when two-way sync begins. Review the initial dataset and matching plan before enabling it; an empty destination can simplify the first load.
Start with one business entity and a stable record ID. Map a small set of editable fields with compatible types, test required values and relationships, then expand after the pilot passes.
Check the destination error, field constraints, permissions, and current source value. The Stacksync issues dashboard supports retry and revert; retry reads current source values, so verify the intended record state before acting.
Use the current Stacksync pricing page and confirm the supported implementation with the team. Scope the required objects, record volume, update frequency, initial load, and support needs when comparing a managed connector with native or custom development.
Start by reviewing Contacts in Microsoft Dynamics 365 and Contacts in Microsoft Graph. Check how these records relate in your workflow, then confirm the actual fields and supported operations. Test record matching and one failed or repeated update before adding more records.
Choose a method around one example record and the update your business needs. Use Contacts / Contacts to review record matching and confirm Stacksync support for the required operations. Compare ongoing sync, a custom workflow, and a scheduled export against that requirement.
Prepare both accounts, the selected object schemas, stable source and destination IDs, and the expected outcome. Provide the Dynamics CRM environment URL and authorize the Stacksync app with Microsoft sign-in. Identify the Microsoft Graph account, edition, environment, and business objects the integration must access. Use the pair worksheet to record ownership and acceptance criteria.
Integration directory
Review documented support, sync direction, and setup requirements on each pair page. Search all 325 integrations listed for Microsoft Dynamics 365 and Microsoft Graph.
Next step
Walk through your Microsoft Dynamics 365 and Microsoft Graph records, field mappings, and requirements with an integration engineer.
