Skip to content
Human resources / Database · Two-way sync platform

Lever and MarkLogic integration

Plan how Lever and MarkLogic should share data across your business. Work with Stacksync engineers on record mapping, system access, and the requirements for running the integration.

  • Scope your workflow with an integration engineer
  • Review the systems, records, and updates you need
Integration planning
stacksync.com

Built for teams where self-serve, reliability and scale matter

Case study
Migrated from MuleSoft
Case study
Migrated from Celigo
Migrated from Heroku Connect
Migrated from Matillion
Case study
Migrated from Fivetran
Case study
Migrated from Celigo

Proposed workflow

Application user or identity sync test

Planning example. Stacksync support for the required connection and record operations needs a technical review.

Starting eventA change involving Lever Users or MarkLogic Users & Roles needs a defined result in the other system.

  1. Start with Lever Users and MarkLogic Users & Roles. Use the record-matching and field-ownership rules from your mapping worksheet.

  2. Resolve tenant and group references and establish a protected administrative-account policy.

  3. Test a normal update and one failed or repeated update in the supported direction. Keep both record IDs with the test results.

What to verifyTest a renamed login, disabled account, missing group, and a user existing in two tenants.

Review records and field ownership

Proposed record relationships

Records to connect

Use these examples to define record matching and field ownership for your technical review.

Download the mapping worksheet

CSV · No email required

Example record relationships between Lever and MarkLogic
Lever recordMarkLogic recordRecord matchingField ownership
UsersProposed record; confirm Stacksync object support.Record matchingUsers & RolesProposed record; confirm Stacksync object support.Use the immutable user ID within the tenant or directory. Do not equate an application user with a CRM customer contact.Identity and application owners approve account lifecycle and access changes; synchronize only approved attributes.
UsersProposed record; confirm Stacksync object support.Reporting datasetProposed application user or identity tableProposed table; choose its name and schema.Use the immutable user ID within the tenant or directory. Do not equate an application user with a CRM customer contact.Identity and application owners approve account lifecycle and access changes; synchronize only approved attributes.
OpportunitiesProposed record; confirm Stacksync object support.Reporting datasetProposed deal or opportunity tableProposed table; choose its name and schema.Keep the opportunity/deal ID separate from any later order or invoice ID.The sales process owns qualification and stage changes; downstream financial records have their own state and approval rules.

These relationships do not establish connector availability. Review the required connection and record operations with Stacksync.

Record coverage to review

Use documented coverage where available. Catalog record types are starting points for review and do not confirm Stacksync support.

Lever

Connection and object support require review

Record types to review with Stacksync

Record typesCoverage and requirements
  • Opportunities
  • Postings
  • Requisitions
  • Offers
  • Users
  • Stages
Confirm support for this record type and the direction you need.

Discuss Lever requirements

MarkLogic

Connection and object support require review

Record types to review with Stacksync

Record typesCoverage and requirements
  • Documents
  • Collections
  • Semantic Triples
  • TDE Views
  • Document Metadata & Properties
  • Databases & Forests
Confirm support for this record type and the direction you need.

Discuss MarkLogic requirements

Connection essentials

Confirm Stacksync support and account requirements for undocumented connections. Interface information alone does not establish connector availability.

View setup requirements and limits
Connection requirementLeverMarkLogic
Integration interfaceREST Data API (api.lever.co/v1)REST API (Client API), plus SQL/ODBC access over TDE views and Java/Node client libraries
AuthenticationConfirm the credentials, API plan, and permissions required for Lever.Confirm the credentials, API plan, and permissions required for MarkLogic.
Change detectionConfirm how Stacksync detects changes for this connector and the objects you need.Confirm how Stacksync detects changes for this connector and the objects you need.
Read accessConfirm with StacksyncConfirm with Stacksync
Write accessConfirm with StacksyncConfirm with Stacksync

Enterprise controls

Security and control for your integrations

Explore security controls

Compliance and data transfers

As a data company, we understand the importance of keeping your data secure. Stacksync is built with security best practices to keep your data safe at every layer, and is DPF-certified for US, EU, UK and CH data transfers.

  • SOC 2 Type II
  • ISO 27001
  • HIPAA BAA
  • GDPR
  • CCPA
  • DPF US-EU-UK-CH

SSO & SCIM

Let your users access Stacksync from your centralized user management systems. Works with Okta, Azure, Google SSO and more.

Alerts

Immediately get alerted about record syncing issues over email, Slack, PagerDuty and WhatsApp. Resolve issues from a centralized dashboard with retry and revert options.

Secure connection options

Record-level recovery

Inspect sync errors and use retry and revert controls to resolve failed updates.

Read the recovery guide

Implementation

Technical reference

Review setup, record relationships, testing, and recovery for your implementation.

Authentication, permissions and API limits

Connection requirements and limits

Lever
Integration interface
REST Data API (api.lever.co/v1)
Authentication
Confirm the credentials, API plan, and permissions required for Lever.
Change detection
Confirm how Stacksync detects changes for this connector and the objects you need.
Read access
Confirm with Stacksync
Write access
Confirm with Stacksync
Setup requirements
  • Identify the Lever account, edition, environment, and business objects the integration must access.
  • Confirm a Stacksync connector or implementation path for Lever, including read/write support, authentication, and initial-load limits.
Limitations to check
  • Confirm Stacksync support for Lever and the record types your workflow needs.
  • Review write-back, deletion handling, update timing, and account limits with the integration team.
Technical documentation
MarkLogic
Integration interface
REST API (Client API), plus SQL/ODBC access over TDE views and Java/Node client libraries
Authentication
Confirm the credentials, API plan, and permissions required for MarkLogic.
Change detection
Confirm how Stacksync detects changes for this connector and the objects you need.
Read access
Confirm with Stacksync
Write access
Confirm with Stacksync
Setup requirements
  • Identify the MarkLogic account, edition, environment, and business objects the integration must access.
  • Confirm a Stacksync connector or implementation path for MarkLogic, including read/write support, authentication, and initial-load limits.
Limitations to check
  • Confirm Stacksync support for MarkLogic and the record types your workflow needs.
  • Review write-back, deletion handling, update timing, and account limits with the integration team.

Prepare Lever and MarkLogic access

Set up both accounts before testing the mapping. Use test records where available, and identify the account administrator who can approve access and help resolve setup errors.

Lever setup checklist
  • Identify the Lever account, edition, environment, and business objects the integration must access.
  • Confirm a Stacksync connector or implementation path for Lever, including read/write support, authentication, and initial-load limits.
MarkLogic setup checklist
  • Identify the MarkLogic account, edition, environment, and business objects the integration must access.
  • Confirm a Stacksync connector or implementation path for MarkLogic, including read/write support, authentication, and initial-load limits.
Prepare to go live

Record the fields each system can update, the first-load cutoff, both record IDs, the expected update delay, and who handles errors. Complete the tests before production before expanding to more records.

Use the Lever and MarkLogic planning worksheet to capture these decisions. Record the access owner in the worksheet and enter credentials only in the connection setup.

Talk to an engineer · Review current pricing

Record identity and field ownership

Use these data-model references to describe the records your connection needs. They are planning examples; connector availability and supported operations must be established before implementation.

Download the mapping worksheet · CSV, no email required

Record matching

Users / Users & Roles

Compare whether Lever Users and MarkLogic Users & Roles describe the same application user or identity in your business.

Planning example. Stacksync support for the required connection and record operations needs a technical review.

Lever
Object support to establish
MarkLogic
Object support to establish
Record identity
Use the immutable user ID within the tenant or directory. Do not equate an application user with a CRM customer contact.
Field ownership
Identity and application owners approve account lifecycle and access changes; synchronize only approved attributes.

Fields to include

  • Source user ID
  • Tenant reference
  • Account status
  • Group references
Record dependencies
Resolve tenant and group references and establish a protected administrative-account policy.
Validation
Test a renamed login, disabled account, missing group, and a user existing in two tenants.
Recovery
Review access impact before retrying a lifecycle change; reconcile current identity state and retain an approval trail.

References: Lever: Users documentation

Reporting dataset

Users / Proposed application user or identity table in MarkLogic (choose its name)

Plan a application user or identity dataset while preserving its source meaning.

Planning example. Stacksync support for the required connection and record operations needs a technical review.

Lever
Object support to establish
MarkLogic
Your database schema
Record identity
Use the immutable user ID within the tenant or directory. Do not equate an application user with a CRM customer contact.
Field ownership
Identity and application owners approve account lifecycle and access changes; synchronize only approved attributes.

Fields to include

  • Source user ID
  • Tenant reference
  • Account status
  • Group references
Record dependencies
Resolve tenant and group references and establish a protected administrative-account policy.
Validation
Test a renamed login, disabled account, missing group, and a user existing in two tenants.
Recovery
Review access impact before retrying a lifecycle change; reconcile current identity state and retain an approval trail.

References: Lever: Users documentation

Reporting dataset

Opportunities / Proposed deal or opportunity table in MarkLogic (choose its name)

Plan a deal or opportunity dataset while preserving its source meaning.

Planning example. Stacksync support for the required connection and record operations needs a technical review.

Lever
Object support to establish
MarkLogic
Your database schema
Record identity
Keep the opportunity/deal ID separate from any later order or invoice ID.
Field ownership
The sales process owns qualification and stage changes; downstream financial records have their own state and approval rules.

Fields to include

  • Source deal ID
  • Stage
  • Amount and currency
  • Expected close date
  • Company reference
Record dependencies
Map the customer and sales pipeline before the opportunity; map stage values deliberately.
Validation
Test a reopened won deal, a stage with no destination equivalent, and an amount using a different currency.
Recovery
Suspend downstream creation for a rejected deal and review whether an order already exists before retrying.

References: Lever: Opportunities documentation

Compare integration approaches

Choose a method around one example record and the update your business needs. Use Users / Users & Roles to review record matching and confirm Stacksync support for the required operations. Compare ongoing sync, a custom workflow, and a scheduled export against that requirement.

Stacksync managed sync

Best fit
Review compatibility with a Stacksync engineer using an example of the records and updates you need.
Operating responsibility
Fits ongoing record synchronization when the required operations are supported. Add workflow steps for approvals or business actions that go beyond copying fields.
Before you choose
Check record matching: Use the immutable user ID within the tenant or directory. Do not equate an application user with a CRM customer contact. Verify field coverage, deletion handling, and how changes are detected.

Native vendor integration

Best fit
A vendor-built integration may fit if it supports your Lever and MarkLogic record types.
Operating responsibility
Can reduce setup for a supported workflow. You may need another method for records or business steps it does not cover.
Before you choose
First check whether either vendor offers this integration. If available, verify Users / Users & Roles, update direction, account tier, and related-record handling.

Custom API or workflow

Best fit
Consider when Lever and MarkLogic need a transformation, approval, or action outside a direct record sync.
Operating responsibility
Provides control over business steps; the team owns credentials, version changes, error queues, and reconciliation.
Before you choose
Verify endpoint permissions, pagination, quotas, duplicate detection, and failure recovery.

File or scheduled snapshot

Best fit
Consider for a one-time Lever / MarkLogic migration or a reporting need with an explicit freshness window.
Operating responsibility
Can simplify a bounded transfer; later changes and deletion history require another extraction or a separately designed incremental process.
Before you choose
Record the extraction cutoff, source IDs, encoding, date/number formats, and reconciliation totals.

Workflow scenarios and expected results

Application user or identity sync test

Planning example. Stacksync support for the required connection and record operations needs a technical review.

Starting event: A change to the selected Users or Users & Roles record needs a defined result in the other system.

  1. Start with Lever Users and MarkLogic Users & Roles. Use the record-matching and field-ownership rules from your mapping worksheet.
  2. Resolve tenant and group references and establish a protected administrative-account policy.
  3. Test a normal update and one failed or repeated update in the supported direction. Keep both record IDs with the test results.

Expected result: Test a renamed login, disabled account, missing group, and a user existing in two tenants.

If it fails: Review access impact before retrying a lifecycle change; reconcile current identity state and retain an approval trail.

Application user or identity reporting workflow

Planning example. Stacksync support for the required connection and record operations needs a technical review.

Starting event: A change to the selected Users or Proposed application user or identity table in MarkLogic (choose its name) record needs a defined result in the other system.

  1. Start with Lever Users and MarkLogic Proposed application user or identity table in MarkLogic (choose its name). Use the record-matching and field-ownership rules from your mapping worksheet.
  2. Resolve tenant and group references and establish a protected administrative-account policy.
  3. Test a normal update and one failed or repeated update in the supported direction. Keep both record IDs with the test results.

Expected result: Test a renamed login, disabled account, missing group, and a user existing in two tenants.

If it fails: Review access impact before retrying a lifecycle change; reconcile current identity state and retain an approval trail.

Deal or opportunity reporting workflow

Planning example. Stacksync support for the required connection and record operations needs a technical review.

Starting event: A change to the selected Opportunities or Proposed deal or opportunity table in MarkLogic (choose its name) record needs a defined result in the other system.

  1. Start with Lever Opportunities and MarkLogic Proposed deal or opportunity table in MarkLogic (choose its name). Use the record-matching and field-ownership rules from your mapping worksheet.
  2. Map the customer and sales pipeline before the opportunity; map stage values deliberately.
  3. Test a normal update and one failed or repeated update in the supported direction. Keep both record IDs with the test results.

Expected result: Test a reopened won deal, a stage with no destination equivalent, and an amount using a different currency.

If it fails: Suspend downstream creation for a rejected deal and review whether an order already exists before retrying.

Worker lifecycle planning for Lever and MarkLogic

This is an evaluation scenario; connector and operation support require confirmation.

Starting event: A worker joins, moves, or leaves in Lever; a downstream process in MarkLogic needs the approved context.

  1. Identify the worker and employment record represented by Opportunities or Users. Retain effective dates and organizational scope.
  2. Determine what Documents or Document Metadata & Properties represents: an operational task, a user identity, or a reporting row. Define a relationship; do not map these records as if they were the employee itself.
  3. Require the process owner to approve any access, payroll, or account action and assign an exception owner.

Expected result: Rehires and concurrent assignments keep distinct employment context; delayed updates do not reverse a newer effective state.

If it fails: Inspect employment identity and effective dates before retrying the downstream action.

Initial load and acceptance testing

Keep both record IDs with the expected and actual result. Reconcile the same filters and time window in each system.

Users / Users & Roles

Test case

Test a renamed login, disabled account, missing group, and a user existing in two tenants.

Expected result

The expected application user or identity relationship is preserved with no duplicate action or unintended write.

Users / Proposed application user or identity table in MarkLogic (choose its name)

Test case

Test a renamed login, disabled account, missing group, and a user existing in two tenants.

Expected result

The expected application user or identity relationship is preserved with no duplicate action or unintended write.

Opportunities / Proposed deal or opportunity table in MarkLogic (choose its name)

Test case

Test a reopened won deal, a stage with no destination equivalent, and an amount using a different currency.

Expected result

The expected deal or opportunity relationship is preserved with no duplicate action or unintended write.

Direction and permissions

Test case

Bring an example source record and the intended destination operation to the compatibility review. Confirm the supported route before granting write access.

Expected result

Only an approved, supported direction and permitted fields are written.

Freshness and reconciliation

Test case

Measure source and destination times for the selected records under normal load and a burst. Reconcile IDs and values using the same filters and cutoff.

Expected result

The process meets its agreed freshness target and reconciliation has no unexplained differences.

Failed updates, retries and recovery

Start with the failed record and the destination error, then inspect the source value, field requirements, and access.

Rejected or repeated application user or identity change

Investigate

Inspect Lever Users and MarkLogic Users & Roles, their IDs, and the destination error.

Next action

Review access impact before retrying a lifecycle change; reconcile current identity state and retain an approval trail.

Rejected or repeated application user or identity change

Investigate

Inspect Lever Users and MarkLogic Proposed application user or identity table in MarkLogic (choose its name), their IDs, and the destination error.

Next action

Review access impact before retrying a lifecycle change; reconcile current identity state and retain an approval trail.

Rejected or repeated deal or opportunity change

Investigate

Inspect Lever Opportunities and MarkLogic Proposed deal or opportunity table in MarkLogic (choose its name), their IDs, and the destination error.

Next action

Suspend downstream creation for a rejected deal and review whether an order already exists before retrying.

A record type or update is unavailable

Investigate

Check the Lever and MarkLogic connector guides, account permissions, and any operations marked On Request.

Next action

Ask the integration team to confirm a supported way to handle that record. Verify whether it needs connector configuration or a separate workflow step.

Source and destination disagree after a retry

Investigate

Compare current source values, destination validation, identity mappings, and any side effects already completed.

Next action

Stacksync issue retry reads the current source state. Decide the intended state before retrying or reverting; reconcile downstream effects separately.

Read the Stacksync issues dashboard guide for retry and revert behavior.

Change detection and update delivery

How updates move between Lever and MarkLogic

See how each system detects changes and which updates the other system can receive. Each direction has its own permissions and record requirements.

Lever MarkLogic Direction requires confirmation

Detect changesConfirm how Stacksync detects changes for this connector and the objects you need.

Apply updatesConfirm that Stacksync can create or update the records you need in MarkLogic.

MarkLogic Lever Direction requires confirmation

Detect changesConfirm how Stacksync detects changes for this connector and the objects you need.

Apply updatesConfirm that Stacksync can create or update the records you need in Lever.

Update timing and record limits
  • Measure initial-load and ongoing-change latency separately. Source detection, selected objects, account limits, and destination validation determine the observed delay.
  • Review write-back, deletion handling, update timing, and account limits with the integration team.
  • Review write-back, deletion handling, update timing, and account limits with the integration team.
FAQ

Lever and MarkLogic integration FAQ

Next step

Plan your integration with an engineer

Walk through your Lever and MarkLogic records, field mappings, and requirements with an integration engineer.