.png){kind=small}
Stacksync vs Celigo for CRM/ERP integration
A direct comparison on the four things that matter once you're running CRM/ERP integration in production: latency, recoverability, governance, and what it costs over three years.
- Author
- Ruben Burdin · Founder & CEO
- Published
- June 3, 2026
- Read time
- 7 min
Latency: scheduled vs event-driven
Celigo's CRM/ERP flows are scheduled. The minimum supported interval is 5 minutes and typical configurations run at 15. That's batch latency dressed as integration. Stacksync runs on change events from each source's native event surface — Salesforce Platform Events, NetSuite SuiteAnalytics queue, HubSpot webhooks — and propagates in sub-second.
5-minute latency is fine for nightly reporting. It is not fine for an inside-sales motion that triggers off CRM changes, or for a finance close that depends on order data being current.
Error replay: per-record vs per-flow
When a Celigo flow fails, you re-run the flow. The flow re-pulls the source and recomputes. If the source has changed, you may not get back the state you needed to replay. Stacksync persists every event in a queue and lets you replay individual records by their original event ID — the event is the source of truth, not the current state of the source system.
- Celigo: rerun the flow; depends on source state at rerun time.
- Stacksync: replay from a stored event offset; deterministic regardless of source state.
Governance and field-level audit
Celigo logs at the record level: "this record was synced". Stacksync logs at the field level: "account_owner on this record changed from X to Y, written from Salesforce at 14:02:11 by user Z, applied to NetSuite at 14:02:11.380". The first answers "did it sync?". The second answers every question your compliance team will ever ask.
FAQ
Frequently asked questions
