/
For organizations managing data across multiple systems, synchronization is a critical requirement. When data must flow between your CRM, ERP, databases, and other business applications, you might assume two separate one-way integrations would effectively create bi-directional synchronization. This approach — setting up one sync from System A to System B and another from System B to System A — seems logical at first glance. However, this "dual one-way" method creates significant hidden challenges that undermine data reliability, system performance, and operational efficiency.
In this article, we'll explore why two one-way syncs fail to deliver true bi-directional synchronization, the technical challenges this approach creates, and how purpose-built two-way sync solutions address these limitations to deliver reliable, real-time data consistency across your business systems.
When organizations need data to flow in both directions between systems, implementing two separate one-way synchronizations feels intuitive. For example, you might set up:
In theory, these dual one-way connections should keep both systems updated with the latest information. In practice, this approach introduces complex problems that can compromise data integrity, create unnecessary technical debt, and generate operational headaches.
Two one-way syncs lack a unified synchronization model with centralized intelligence to manage the bi-directional data flow holistically. Instead, they operate as independent processes, each unaware of the other's activities. This creates several critical issues:
Perhaps the most serious issue with two one-way syncs is the inability to properly handle conflicts — situations where the same record is modified in both systems within a short timeframe.
Consider this common scenario: A sales representative updates a customer's phone number in the CRM while an operations team member simultaneously updates the same customer's address in the ERP. With two separate one-way syncs:
But what happens when fields conflict? If both systems update the same field differently:
This "update war" creates data inconsistency, unnecessary API calls, and potential system performance issues. Without a centralized conflict resolution strategy, your systems may never reach a stable state.
Two independent sync processes introduce timing issues that can compromise data integrity. These race conditions occur when the sequence of operations becomes unpredictable:
These timing problems become more pronounced as data volumes and update frequencies increase, making the approach unscalable for growing organizations.
With two separate integrations, error handling becomes twice as complex. Each sync process requires its own error detection, logging, alerting, and recovery mechanisms. When issues occur, debugging becomes challenging because:
This complexity increases operational overhead and the risk of extended outages or data inconsistencies.
A mid-market e-commerce company implemented two one-way syncs between their Salesforce CRM and operational database. Shortly after deployment, they encountered several problems:
The situation culminated in a critical incident during a holiday promotion when their integration infrastructure couldn't handle the increased volume of updates, resulting in orders being lost between systems.
Beyond the technical challenges, two separate one-way syncs create significant business costs:
True bi-directional synchronization fundamentally differs from dual one-way syncs in its architectural approach. A purpose-built bi-directional sync solution provides:
True two-way synchronization platforms typically leverage advanced technologies to ensure data consistency:
Another crucial difference: true bi-directional synchronization typically operates in real-time or near-real-time, while dual one-way syncs often run on schedules (hourly, daily, etc.). This timing difference has profound implications:
If you're currently using two one-way syncs, ask yourself these questions:
When evaluating true bi-directional synchronization platforms, prioritize these capabilities:
While implementing two one-way syncs may seem like a reasonable approach to bi-directional data integration, the technical limitations make it unsuitable for organizations that rely on consistent, reliable data across systems. The conflict resolution problems, timing issues, and operational complexity create unnecessary risks and costs.
True bi-directional synchronization platforms solve these challenges through purpose-built architectures designed specifically for keeping data in sync across multiple systems in real-time. By implementing a genuine two-way sync solution, organizations can eliminate data inconsistencies, reduce engineering overhead, and build a scalable foundation for data-driven operations.
As your business grows and data becomes increasingly critical to your operations, investing in proper bi-directional synchronization isn't just a technical decision—it's a strategic imperative for maintaining operational excellence and supporting continued growth.
Ready to move beyond the limitations of dual one-way synchronizations? Explore how a true bi-directional sync solution can eliminate data inconsistencies and free your engineering team from integration maintenance. Contact us today for a demonstration of real-time, two-way synchronization that scales with your business needs.
