/
Data engineering

Supabase at Scale: From 10K to 10M Records Without Burning Out

Your Supabase prototype just landed an enterprise client with 10M+ records. Learn how to scale without rebuilding, hurting DX, or hiring DevOps.

Supabase at Scale: From 10K to 10M Records Without Burning Out

Your Supabase prototype just landed an enterprise client with 10M+ records. You need to scale fast without rebuilding your stack, compromising developer experience, or hiring a DevOps team. The good news: scaling Supabase for enterprise workloads doesn’t require abandoning what made it great. It requires extending it with the right sync architecture.

The Supabase Scaling Paradox: When Success Becomes Your Biggest Problem

You chose Supabase for speed. Postgres at the core, real-time subscriptions, auth out of the box. Your MVP shipped in weeks. Early customers loved it. Then enterprise arrived—with requirements your current setup was never designed for.

Common breaking points appear quickly:

  • 10M+ records synced across multiple systems when you’re handling 50K today
  • Sub-second latency while you’re seeing 3–5 second delays
  • Bidirectional sync with Salesforce, NetSuite, and a data warehouse
  • SOC 2 compliance and audit logs that your architecture doesn’t support yet

At this moment, most teams believe they have only two options.

The Two Paths Everyone Knows (And Why They’re Painful)

Option 1: Rebuild on “enterprise-grade” infrastructure

  • 6+ months of engineering work
  • $500K+ in opportunity cost
  • Lost momentum and delayed roadmap

Option 2: Build custom sync infrastructure in-house

  • 3–6 months just to reach production
  • Constant maintenance of brittle APIs and webhooks
  • Senior engineers stuck doing data plumbing instead of product work

Both paths sacrifice the very thing that made Supabase attractive: developer velocity.

The Third Path: Scale Without Rebuilding

There’s a third approach that preserves Supabase’s developer experience while meeting enterprise requirements: treat Supabase as your operational core, and layer enterprise-grade two-way sync on top of it.

According to Ant Wilson, Co‑Founder and CTO at Supabase:

“Triggers to external systems and workflow automation are a game-changer for both operational use cases and analytics.”

This shift matters now more than ever. In the AI era, winning teams aren’t defined by models—they’re defined by real-time access to operational data. Supabase already gives you the foundation. What’s missing is production-grade sync.

Why Supabase Is the Right Foundation (If You Extend It Correctly)

Supabase is built on PostgreSQL, which gives you powerful primitives:

  • Logical replication and WAL-based change tracking
  • SQL-first data modeling
  • Strong transactional guarantees

What it doesn’t provide out of the box is enterprise operational sync the ability to reliably propagate changes across CRMs, ERPs, and warehouses in real time without loops, conflicts, or API failures.

That gap is where teams usually break or scale cleanly.

Architecture Patterns That Actually Scale Supabase

True Bidirectional Sync (Not Two One-Way Pipelines)

Two one-way syncs create data loops, race conditions, and silent overwrites at scale. True bidirectional sync tracks field-level changes, enforces conflict resolution, and guarantees consistency across systems.

This is the difference between “it works in staging” and “it survives enterprise traffic.”

SQL-First Operational Hub

With a SQL-first approach, your team continues working in Postgres while data syncs automatically to systems like Salesforce and NetSuite. Engineers don’t learn new APIs—they keep shipping features.

Event-Driven Triggers

Change events in Supabase become operational signals:

  • A deal update triggers downstream workflows
  • Inventory changes propagate instantly to ERP and CRM
  • Customer state stays consistent everywhere

Your database becomes the orchestration layer for the entire stack.

Proven Enterprise Architecture

These patterns are validated in the Complete Architecture Guide for Two-Way Sync Between Enterprise Systems, with insights from:

  • Ant Wilson (CTO, Supabase)
  • Armon Petrossian (CEO, Coalesce)
  • Data specialists from Google Cloud and MongoDB

This isn’t theory it’s production architecture.

Buy vs Build: The ROI CTOs Actually Care About

For technical leaders like Alex—the pragmatic CTO measured on delivery and ROI—the math is simple.

Building and maintaining enterprise sync infrastructure typically costs:

  • 10+ developer-months upfront
  • Ongoing operational and maintenance burden
  • Increased risk of failure as scale grows

Buying purpose-built sync infrastructure:

  • Saves months of engineering time
  • Eliminates long-term maintenance
  • Preserves developer velocity
  • De-risks enterprise deals

Those saved developer-months translate directly into faster product innovation and revenue.

How Supabase and Stacksync Work Together (Without Breaking DX)

Supabase doesn’t need to be replaced to meet enterprise requirements. It needs to be extended.

This is where Supabase and Stacksync naturally fit together.

Supabase remains your system of record: PostgreSQL, auth, real-time subscriptions, and the developer experience your team already loves. Stacksync operates as the operational sync layer that Supabase was never meant to be—handling enterprise-grade, two-way data movement across CRMs, ERPs, and warehouses.

The division of responsibility is clean:

  • Supabase continues to power your product and internal tooling
  • Stacksync manages bidirectional sync, conflict resolution, retries, audit logs, and compliance

From an engineering perspective, nothing changes in how you build features. Teams keep working in SQL and Postgres. There are no new APIs to learn, no webhooks to maintain, and no fragile glue code to own. When a record changes in Supabase, Stacksync propagates that change in real time to systems like Salesforce or NetSuite. When updates happen in those systems, they flow back safely, without data loops, overwrites, or latency spikes.

For technical leaders, this pairing solves a specific problem: scaling operational data flows without reallocating senior engineers to integration maintenance. Instead of rebuilding or hiring a DevOps team, Supabase + Stacksync provides a pragmatic path to enterprise readiness preserving developer velocity while meeting performance, reliability, and compliance expectations.

It’s not a new stack. It’s the same stack, scaled with intent.

→  FAQS
Can Supabase handle 10 million or more records in production?
Yes, Supabase can handle tens of millions of records at the database level because it is built on PostgreSQL, which is proven at enterprise scale. The real limitation usually appears around operational workloads such as real-time sync, cross-system integrations, latency, and compliance requirements, not raw storage. Scaling successfully depends on how Supabase is extended for production data flows rather than replacing it.
Do I need to migrate away from Supabase to support enterprise customers?
No, most teams do not need to migrate away from Supabase to support enterprise customers. Supabase works well as the system of record, but it must be complemented with an enterprise-grade operational sync layer to handle bidirectional data movement, retries, conflict resolution, and auditability. This approach allows teams to meet enterprise requirements without rebuilding their backend.
What usually breaks first when scaling Supabase to enterprise workloads?
The first issues typically appear in data synchronization and latency rather than in the database itself. Teams often struggle with keeping Supabase in sync with CRMs, ERPs, and warehouses, handling API limits, preventing data loops, and maintaining sub-second updates. These problems grow quickly once record counts and system complexity increase.
How is true bidirectional sync different from running two one-way syncs?
True bidirectional sync tracks changes at a granular level and applies conflict resolution rules to prevent data loops and overwrites. Two one-way syncs operate independently and often cause race conditions, duplicated updates, or silent failures at scale. For enterprise workloads, this distinction is critical to maintain data consistency and system reliability.
Is building custom sync infrastructure a good long-term option for Supabase teams?
Building custom sync infrastructure can work short term but usually becomes a long-term burden as scale increases. Teams often underestimate the time required to handle retries, rate limits, monitoring, compliance, and ongoing maintenance. For most CTOs, buying a purpose-built operational sync layer is more cost-effective and preserves engineering focus on core product development.

Syncing data at scale
across all industries.

a blue checkmark icon
14-day trial
a blue checkmark icon
Two-way, Real-time sync
a blue checkmark icon
Workflow automation
a blue checkmark icon
White-glove onboarding
“We’ve been using Stacksync across 4 different projects and can’t imagine working without it.”

Alex Marinov

VP Technology, Acertus Delivers
Vehicle logistics powered by technology