/
Modern enterprises depend on a suite of specialized applications—CRMs for sales, ERPs for finance, and databases for core product data. While this best-of-breed approach enhances departmental efficiency, it creates a significant technical challenge: data fragmentation. Critical business information becomes locked in silos, leading to operational inefficiencies, poor decision-making, and a disjointed customer experience.
Data integration platforms like Fivetran and Airbyte emerged to address this, primarily by consolidating data into a central warehouse for analytics. They excel at one-way data movement (ETL/ELT). However, this model exposes a critical gap for operational use cases. Business teams do not operate out of a data warehouse; they work within live applications like Salesforce, NetSuite, and HubSpot. For these teams, data that is hours old or flows in only one direction is a fundamental roadblock to productivity and real-time decision-making.
This article provides a technical comparison between the batch-based, uni-directional model of Fivetran and Airbyte and the real-time, bi-directional synchronization offered by Stacksync, demonstrating why operational data integrity requires a purpose-built solution.
Fivetran and Airbyte are prominent platforms in the Extract, Load, Transform (ELT) space. Their primary function is to move data from hundreds of sources into a data warehouse or data lake, enabling business intelligence and analytics.
Fivetran is a managed, closed-source ELT tool known for its reliability and ease of use. It offers over 500 pre-built, zero-maintenance connectors designed to pipe data into destinations like Snowflake and BigQuery[1].
Airbyte is a flexible, open-source data integration engine with a rapidly growing library of over 550 connectors. Its open-source nature allows engineering teams to build or customize connectors, offering greater control and adaptability[1].
While they have different approaches to development and pricing, their core architectural philosophy is the same: move data one-way for analytical purposes.
| Feature | Fivetran | Airbyte |
|---|---|---|
| Core Function | Managed ELT (Extract, Load, Transform) | Open-Source ELT (Extract, Load, Transform) |
| Sync Direction | Uni-directional (One-Way) | Uni-directional (One-Way) |
| Sync Speed | Batch-based (minutes to hours) | Batch-based (minutes to hours) |
| Primary Use Case | Business Intelligence & Analytics | Business Intelligence & Analytics |
| Custom Connectors | Not supported | Supported (Connector Development Kit) |
| Target Destination | Data Warehouses & Lakes | Data Warehouses, Lakes, & Databases |
The ELT model, while effective for analytics, is fundamentally misaligned with the demands of real-time business operations. The technical limitations of this architecture create significant operational friction.
Both Fivetran and Airbyte operate on a batch-based schedule. Data synchronization typically occurs at intervals ranging from five minutes to several hours[2]. For analytics, this delay is often acceptable. For operations, it is a critical failure point.
Consider these scenarios:
A sales representative views a customer record in Salesforce that doesn't reflect a critical support ticket just created in Zendesk.
A finance team in NetSuite approves a credit limit increase, but the sales team in HubSpot remains unaware for another hour, delaying a crucial deal.
An inventory update in a backend database isn't reflected in Shopify, leading to overselling.
In these cases, latency directly translates to lost revenue, poor customer experience, and operational errors.
A significant limitation is that Fivetran and Airbyte are built for data aggregation, not synchronization. They cannot natively write data back from a warehouse to operational systems like a CRM or ERP. This one-way data flow solves the problem of a centralized analytics view but fails to ensure consistency across the operational tools that business teams rely on.
While "Reverse ETL" tools have emerged to address this, they are an additional layer of complexity and cost, effectively creating two separate, one-way data pipelines that must be managed independently. This is not true bi-directional sync and lacks the built-in conflict resolution and data integrity guarantees required for mission-critical systems.
Operational integrity requires a different architectural paradigm—one built for real-time, bi-directional data synchronization. This is the specific technical problem Stacksync was engineered to solve.
Stacksync is an operational data integration platform that provides true, two-way, real-time sync between enterprise systems. Instead of merely piping data to a warehouse, it ensures that CRMs, ERPs, and databases remain in a constant state of consistency.
Key architectural differentiators include:
True Bi-Directional Sync: A core engine designed to propagate changes in either direction with built-in conflict resolution. This is not two one-way pipelines; it is a single, cohesive synchronization fabric.
Real-Time, Event-Driven Architecture: Stacksync operates with millisecond latency, capturing and propagating changes as they happen. This eliminates the data staleness inherent in batch-based systems[3].
Operational Focus: The platform is purpose-built to support mission-critical business processes that depend on live, accurate data across multiple applications.
| Capability | Stacksync | Fivetran | Airbyte |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary Use Case | Operational Sync & Workflow Automation | Analytics (ELT) | Analytics (ELT) |
| Sync Direction | True Bi-Directional | Uni-Directional | Uni-Directional |
| Sync Speed/Latency | Real-Time (milliseconds) | Batch (minutes to hours) | Batch (minutes to hours) |
| Conflict Resolution | Built-in, configurable rules | N/A | N/A |
| Workflow Automation | Integrated, event-driven workflows | N/A | N/A |
| Target Systems | Operational Systems (CRMs, ERPs, DBs) | Data Warehouses & Lakes | Data Warehouses, Lakes, & DBs |
| Heroku Connect Alternative | Yes, direct and more flexible replacement | No | No |
The need for operational sync is often addressed with complex and costly alternatives, each with its own technical drawbacks.
iPaaS Platforms: These platforms can be configured to perform synchronization, but it is not their core function. Building reliable, bi-directional sync in an iPaaS is a complex engineering task that results in brittle, hard-to-maintain workflows. Stacksync provides a purpose-built, more reliable, and efficient solution for this specific task.
Point Solutions: Tools like Heroku Connect solve a single problem, such as syncing Salesforce and Postgres. This approach creates vendor lock-in and requires new solutions for every additional integration. As a direct alternative, Stacksync offers a scalable, vendor-agnostic platform with over 200 connectors, future-proofing an organization's integration strategy.
Custom Code: Building integrations in-house provides ultimate flexibility but consumes immense engineering resources. Teams spend months on "dirty API plumbing"—handling authentication, pagination, rate limits, and error states—instead of focusing on core product development. Stacksync abstracts away this complexity entirely.
Adopting a real-time, bi-directional sync platform like Stacksync delivers tangible technical and operational empowerment.
Guaranteed Data Consistency: Eliminate data discrepancies and ensure all teams—from sales and support to finance and operations—are working from a single, reliable source of truth.
Automated Reliability: The platform's advanced error handling, instant rollback capabilities, version control, and smart API rate limit management ensure that integrations are always on and resilient to failure[4].
Effortless Scalability: Stacksync is designed to handle millions of records from day one without requiring engineering teams to manage complex streaming infrastructure[5].
Increased Engineering Velocity: By providing a managed, no-code solution for a complex engineering problem, Stacksync frees developers to focus on building features that create a competitive advantage.
Fivetran and Airbyte are powerful and effective tools for their intended purpose: populating data warehouses for analytics. They have rightfully earned their place in the modern data stack for BI.
However, the needs of operational teams have evolved beyond what batch-based, one-way data pipelines can support. To run an efficient, data-driven business, organizations require data that is not only centralized but also consistent, current, and available within the applications where work happens.
For this, a different architecture is necessary. Stacksync provides the real-time, bi-directional synchronization required to power today's interconnected enterprise. It eliminates data silos at their source, ensures operational integrity, and empowers teams to act with speed and confidence. When your business operations depend on live data, choose the platform built for the task.
