/
ETL means "extract, transform, and load" and refers to the process of moving data between systems where you can perform data analysis. ETL tools make this possible for a wide variety of data sources and data destinations. But how do you decide which ETL tool, or ELT tool you need for today's operational requirements?
The first step to making full use of your data is getting it all consolidated in one location a data warehouse or data lake. From that repository you can create reports that combine data from multiple sources and make better decisions based on a more complete picture of your organization's operations.
Theoretically, you could write your own software to replicate data from sources to destinations, but this approach is generally ill-advised for building your own data pipeline.
Fortunately, you don't have to write those tools yourself, because data warehouses are accompanied by a whole class of supporting software to feed them, including open source ETL tools, free ETL tools, and various commercial options. Understanding the evolution of analytics helps identify the top ETL tools to use today.
The key criteria for choosing an ETL tool include:
We'll cover each of these criteria in detail below. But first, here's background on how ETL tools evolved and why you need the right ETL tool for operational requirements.
In the early days of data warehousing, if you wanted to replicate data from your in-house applications and databases, you'd write a program to do three things:
The process is called ETL extract, transform, and load.
Traditional data integration providers such as Teradata, Greenplum, and SAP HANA offered data warehouses for on-premise machines. Analytics processing can be CPU-intensive and involve large volumes of data, so these data-processing servers had to be more robust than typical application servers—making them significantly more expensive and maintenance-intensive.
Moreover, the ETL workflow proved quite brittle. The moment data models either upstream (at the source) or downstream (as needed by analysts) changed, the pipeline had to be rebuilt to accommodate the new data models.
These challenges reflected the key tradeoff made under ETL: conserving computation and storage resources at the expense of labor.
In the mid-2000s, Amazon Web Services began ramping up cloud computing. By running analytics on cloud servers, organizations could avoid high capital expenditures for hardware. Instead, they could pay for only what they needed in terms of processing power or storage capacity. That also meant a reduction in the size of the staff needed to maintain high-end servers.
Nowadays, few organizations buy expensive on-premises hardware. Instead, their data warehouses run in the cloud on AWS Redshift, Google BigQuery, Microsoft Azure Synapse Analytics, or Snowflake. With cloud computing, workloads can scale almost infinitely and very quickly to meet any level of processing demand. Businesses are limited primarily by their budgets.
An analytics repository that scales means you no longer have to limit data warehouse workloads to analytics tasks. Need to run transformations on your data? You can do it in your data warehouse which means you don't need to perform transformations in a staging environment before loading the data.
Instead, you load the data straight from the source, faithfully replicating it to your data warehouse, and then transform it. ETL has become ELT—although many people still use the old name out of familiarity.
Now that we have context, we can start answering the question: Which ETL tool or ETL solution is best for you? The most important factors to consider include environment, architecture, automation, synchronization model, and reliability.
As we discussed in our analysis of ETL history, data integration tools and data warehouses were traditionally housed on-premise. Many older, on-premise ETL tools remain available today, sometimes adapted to handle cloud data warehouse destinations.
More modern approaches leverage the power of the cloud. If your data warehouse runs on the cloud, you want a cloud-native data integration tool that was architected from the start for ELT and real-time capabilities.
Another important consideration is the architectural difference between ETL, ELT, and real-time bi-directional synchronization. Traditional ETL requires high upfront monetary and labor costs, as well as ongoing costs in the form of constant revision.
By contrast, ELT radically simplifies data integration by decoupling extraction and loading from transformations, making data modeling more analyst-centric rather than engineering-centric.
However, organizations are increasingly moving away from traditional, batch-based ETL systems in favor of modern integration platforms that support low-code automation, event-driven pipelines, and real-time data flow. For operational systems where data consistency directly impacts business processes, real-time bi-directional synchronization becomes essential.
Ultimately, the goal is to make things as simple as possible, which leads directly to automation. You want a tool that lets you specify a source and then copy data to a destination with minimal human intervention.
The tool should automatically read and understand the schema of the source data, know the constraints of the destination platform, and make necessary adaptations to move data from one to another. Those adaptations might include de-nesting source records if the destination doesn't support nested data structures.
All of that should be automatic. The point of an ETL tool is to avoid coding. The advantages of ELT and cloud computing are significantly diminished if you have to involve skilled DBAs or data engineers every time you replicate new data.
Key automation features include:
Programmatic Control: REST APIs for managing connectors, field selection, replication types, and process orchestration automatically, which can be more efficient than managing through dashboard interfaces.
Automated Schema Migration: Changes to source schemas should automatically propagate to destination schemas, reducing manual work to keep analytics current.
Slowly Changing Dimensions: Efficient tracking of infrequent data changes like customer names or business addresses through timestamped row additions.
Incremental Update Options: Change data capture (CDC) capabilities that identify exactly which rows and columns need updates, avoiding wholesale data copying.
All this simplicity provides limited value if your data pipeline is unreliable. A reliable data pipeline has high uptime and delivers data with high fidelity.
One design consideration that enhances reliability is repeatability, or idempotence. The platform should repeat any sync if it fails, without producing duplicate or conflicting data.
Network failures, storage devices filling up, and natural disasters taking whole data centers offline all happen. Part of the reason you choose an ETL tool is so you don't have to worry about how your data pipeline will recover from failure. Your provider should route around problems and redo replications without incurring data duplication or missing any data.
For operational systems handling sensitive data, enterprise-grade security becomes critical. Look for platforms with SOC 2, GDPR, HIPAA, and ISO 27001 certifications. Data should be encrypted in transit with no persistent storage of sensitive information.
When evaluating tools for operational data synchronization, Stacksync provides specialized capabilities for real-time, bi-directional sync between CRMs, ERPs, and databases. Unlike traditional ETL platforms designed primarily for analytics workflows, Stacksync focuses on maintaining consistent data across operational systems where accuracy directly impacts business operations.
Key capabilities include:
Stacksync's pricing structure scales from mid-market to enterprise deployments, with implementations typically measured in days rather than months.
Fivetran remains strong for one-way data warehouse loading but primarily serves analytics use cases. Fivetran is a fully managed ETL and data pipeline automation platform designed for companies that need an easy-to-use, low-maintenance data integration solution. With 500+ pre-built connectors, it simplifies data extraction from multiple sources and loads data into cloud data warehouses like Snowflake, BigQuery, and Redshift. However, Fivetran is strictly a one-way data mover and lacks reverse ETL capabilities. Its consumption-based pricing model (Monthly Active Rows or MAR) can become expensive at scale, and customers have noted that the addition of new connectors can be slow.
Airbyte offers extensive connector options through its open-source model. Airbyte is an open-source ETL platform that allows teams to customize their data integration pipelines. It offers 550+ connectors and supports both self-hosted and cloud deployments. While attractive for cost-conscious organizations, the reliance on "community-supported" connectors means many can be brittle or not production-ready at scale, requiring internal engineering resources to maintain.
Stitch (now part of Talend) focuses on simple data replication. Stitch operates on a consumption-based pricing model, charging based on the volume of data replicated. Stitch $180/month for 10 million rows provides transparent pricing but lacks the sophisticated synchronization logic required for operational bi-directional workflows.
Established platforms like Informatica, MuleSoft, and Dell Boomi offer comprehensive integration capabilities but typically require extensive implementation cycles and specialized expertise. These platforms excel in complex transformation scenarios but may be over-engineered for organizations primarily seeking reliable operational data synchronization.
The data integration market is witnessing robust momentum, driven by the convergence of multi-cloud strategies, API-first development, and demand for AI-ready data infrastructure. As enterprises accelerate digital transformation, data integration has emerged as a strategic imperative for enabling real-time insights, operational efficiency, and cross-platform interoperability.
Traditional ETL and ELT approaches create inherent delays between business events and data availability across systems. While batch processing suffices for analytics workflows, operational systems require immediate consistency for:
Customer-Facing Processes: Sales representatives need current customer information across CRM and operational systems. When a customer updates their contact information in one system, all touchpoints must reflect this change immediately to avoid confusion and maintain trust.
Financial Operations: Deal data must remain synchronized between CRM and ERP systems to ensure accurate forecasting and billing. Real-time synchronization prevents discrepancies that could affect revenue recognition and customer relationships.
Inventory and Supply Chain: E-commerce platforms require real-time inventory updates across multiple sales channels. Without bi-directional synchronization, overselling and customer dissatisfaction become inevitable.
The Data Integration Market is expected to reach USD 17.58 billion in 2025 and grow at a CAGR of 13.6% to reach USD 33.24 billion by 2030, with much of this growth driven by real-time operational requirements.
Organizations implementing real-time bi-directional synchronization typically experience:
Operational Efficiency: Automated synchronization eliminates duplicate data entry, reduces reconciliation efforts, and frees staff for value-added activities. Organizations typically see 40-50% reductions in manual data management overhead.
Enhanced Decision-Making: Real-time data availability enables immediate responses to market changes, customer requests, and operational issues without waiting for batch updates.
Improved Customer Experience: Consistent information across all touchpoints ensures customers receive accurate data regardless of interaction channel, building trust and reducing friction.
Reduced Integration Complexity: Purpose-built synchronization platforms eliminate custom code development and maintenance while providing enterprise-grade reliability.
Organizations evaluating real-time synchronization should consider:
System Architecture: Legacy systems may require modernization to support real-time data flows effectively. Database-centric approaches often provide the most straightforward path to implementation.
Data Volume and Performance: Real-time data integration is an emerging trend driven by the need for instant access to actionable insights. Businesses are prioritizing real-time data processing and analytics to make timely decisions.
Security Requirements: Real-time data movement requires robust security controls and monitoring for sensitive information, particularly important for operational systems handling customer and financial data.
Change Management: Teams must adapt processes and workflows to leverage real-time data availability effectively, often requiring training and process redesign.
The evolution from traditional ETL to real-time bi-directional synchronization represents a fundamental shift in how organizations approach data integration. Real-time integration empowers organizations to respond swiftly to market changes, enhance customer experiences, and optimize operations. With the growth of IoT, e-commerce, and mobile apps, real-time data integration is vital for staying competitive and meeting evolving data demands.
While traditional ETL platforms like Fivetran serve analytics requirements effectively, and ELT approaches provide cloud-native processing capabilities, operational systems increasingly require specialized solutions. Fivetran, Airbyte, and Stitch are mature platforms for their intended purpose: one-way data replication to a data warehouse to power analytics and BI. General-purpose iPaaS platforms like Workato or MuleSoft offer broad capabilities for enterprise-wide workflow automation but may be overly complex and inefficient for the specific challenge of real-time data synchronization.
For organizations prioritizing operational data consistency, platforms specifically designed for bi-directional synchronization provide the capabilities needed for real-time operational efficiency. The key is selecting the right tool for your specific requirements: analytics-focused ETL/ELT platforms for data warehouse workflows, or specialized bi-directional sync tools for operational system integration.
As data integration requirements continue evolving, purpose-built solutions deliver the reliability, performance, and operational efficiency that modern enterprises demand. The fastest-growing segment focuses on operational data synchronization that directly impacts business operations rather than just analytics insights.
Ready to experience true bi-directional data synchronization for your operational systems? Start with Stacksync's 14-day free trial and discover how purpose-built synchronization can transform your operational efficiency while eliminating the engineering overhead of traditional ETL approaches.
