/
Data engineering

Why High-Volume Heroku Connect Fails and Stacksync Wins

Facing Heroku Connect high volume problems like sync delays? Learn why it fails at scale and how Stacksync offers a reliable, real-time alternative.

Why High-Volume Heroku Connect Fails and Stacksync Wins

Heroku Connect is a data synchronization service designed to sync data between a Salesforce instance and a Heroku Postgres database [7].

For basic use cases or development environments with small data volumes, it offers a straightforward way to make Salesforce data accessible to applications running on Heroku. However, its architectural design reveals significant limitations when subjected to the high-volume, real-time demands of modern enterprise applications. As data scales, what was once a convenient tool becomes a bottleneck riddled with latency, API limit errors, and opaque failures [1].

This article explores the common failure points of Heroku Connect at scale and presents Stacksync as a purpose-built, superior alternative engineered for reliable, high-volume data synchronization in real time.

The Breaking Point: Common Heroku Connect High-Volume Problems

While Heroku Connect can function for small datasets, its architecture simply wasn't designed for the velocity and volume of enterprise-level data loads. As companies grow, they inevitably hit a breaking point where Heroku Connect's limitations directly impact business operations, leading them to search for a solution to replace Heroku Connect with affordable real-time sync that scales. Below, we break down the specific issues that arise when data volume and complexity increase.

Sync Delays and Latency

Heroku Connect relies on a polling mechanism, which periodically checks for data changes at set intervals—typically every 10 minutes. This polling architecture introduces inherent latency, making the tool fundamentally unsuitable for mission-critical applications that require up-to-the-minute data consistency. When dealing with a high volume of updates, this polling method creates significant backlogs. A 10-minute sync interval can quickly stretch into hours as the system struggles to process pending writes, leaving your applications and teams working with stale, unreliable data [2]. This trade-off between simplicity and real-time performance becomes untenable as operational demands grow.

API Limit Headaches and Inefficient Batching

A major challenge with high-volume Heroku Connect usage is its consumption of Salesforce API call quotas. The platform's method of batching updates can quickly exhaust daily or hourly API limits, especially during periods of frequent data changes. The problem is compounded by how Heroku Connect handles certain errors. For instance, attempting to update the same record multiple times within a single batch can trigger a "Maximum number of duplicate updates" error [3]. This forces Heroku Connect to fall back from the efficient Bulk API to the much slower, call-intensive SOAP API, exacerbating delays and increasing the risk of hitting API limits. This inefficient error-handling loop creates a cascade of performance degradation just when you need reliability the most.

Opaque Error Handling and Difficult Troubleshooting

Diagnosing performance issues in Heroku Connect is notoriously challenging, often leading to what engineers describe as "silent failures." Errors can be cryptic and buried deep within logs, requiring significant engineering effort to investigate and debug [4]. The platform lacks a centralized, user-friendly dashboard for issue management, meaning teams are frequently unaware of sync problems until they cause a tangible impact on business operations. Navigating through Heroku Connect's log messages to identify the root cause of a failure is a reactive and time-consuming process that diverts valuable engineering resources from core product development [6].

Scalability and Two-Way Sync Limitations

Heroku Connect was not built for true, real-time bidirectional synchronization, a standard requirement for most modern operational systems. While it supports syncing data in both directions, its architecture is not robust enough to handle the complexities of simultaneous updates, leading to race conditions, data conflicts, and an overall fragile integration. As discussed in our real-time sync showdown for ops teams, attempting to force complex two-way syncs in Heroku Connect often results in a brittle system that requires constant monitoring and manual intervention to maintain data integrity. This fundamental architectural limitation makes it an unsuitable foundation for scalable applications that depend on consistent data across multiple systems.

How Stacksync Is Engineered for High-Volume, Real-Time Sync

In contrast, Stacksync is the solution engineered specifically to overcome the limitations of tools like Heroku Connect. Where Heroku Connect falters under pressure, Stacksync thrives. Our platform was built from the ground up for the speed, reliability, and scalability required by modern data-driven enterprises.

True Real-Time, Event-Driven Architecture

Stacksync's event-driven architecture is a fundamental departure from Heroku Connect's polling method. Instead of checking for changes on a fixed schedule, Stacksync uses webhooks and Change Data Capture (CDC) to react to data changes the moment they happen. This means data is synchronized in milliseconds, not minutes, ensuring your systems are always current. This real-time capability eliminates data staleness and provides the foundation for truly responsive applications and workflows.

Intelligent API and Rate Limit Management

To address the common issue of hitting API quotas, Stacksync features "Smart API Rate Limits." Our platform doesn't just send requests until a limit is hit; it intelligently monitors your API usage and Salesforce's dynamic thresholds. It automatically adapts by pacing and batching calls to maximize throughput without ever exceeding your quotas. This proactive, adaptive approach prevents API-related failures and ensures your syncs run reliably, even during peak data activity.

Proactive Issue Management and Full Visibility

Stacksync provides a dedicated sync issue management dashboard that offers complete visibility into your data flows. This prevents silent failures by providing clear alerts and notifications via email, Slack, or other channels. If a sync fails, our platform gives you the power to retry or revert the change with a single click, dramatically reducing debugging time from hours to seconds. This transparency and control transform error handling from a reactive forensic exercise into a proactive management task [5].

Built for Scale and Complex Workflows

Stacksync is designed to handle millions of records from day one without performance degradation. Our platform offers native support for true, real-time two-way synchronization, ensuring data integrity even with complex, multi-system workflows. Whether you're working with standard or custom objects and fields, Stacksync provides the power and flexibility needed to build robust integrations. As a leading Heroku Connect alternative, Stacksync empowers teams to scale confidently.

Feature-by-Feature: Stacksync vs. Heroku Connect

The differences between Stacksync and Heroku Connect become clear when compared side-by-side.

Category Heroku Connect Stacksync
Sync Speed Polling-based (10-minute intervals) Event-driven (real-time, milliseconds)
Scalability Struggles with >1M records Built to sync millions of records
API Limit Handling Basic, often hits limits Smart, adaptive rate limits prevent failures
Error Handling Cryptic logs, difficult to debug Visual dashboard, alerts, 1-click retry
Two-Way Sync Limited and prone to errors Native, real-time bidirectional sync
Setup & Maintenance Requires ongoing monitoring and manual intervention No-code setup with fully managed infrastructure

Key Takeaways

Heroku Connect relies on polling with slow intervals, limited two-way sync, and frequent API-limit issues that require ongoing monitoring.

Stacksync delivers event-driven, millisecond syncing with adaptive API control and a visual issue dashboard.

If your team needs reliable real-time sync at scale without the operational overhead, Stacksync is a significantly more robust choice.

Conclusion: Move Beyond Fragile Syncs

Heroku Connect can be a functional tool for small-scale projects or initial development phases. However, it inevitably fails when faced with the realities of high-volume data and the need for real-time consistency. These failures manifest as costly data delays, frustrating engineering headaches, and unacceptable business risks.

For companies that have outgrown basic tools and require a reliable, scalable, and truly real-time data synchronization platform, Stacksync is the definitive, modern solution. We provide the robust infrastructure needed to unify data across your operational systems, freeing your engineering teams to focus on building value, not fixing broken integrations.

Ready to see the difference? Explore our powerful Heroku Connect alternative and see how Stacksync can transform your data strategy.

→  FAQS
What are the first signs Heroku Connect is struggling with data volume?
The most common signs include sync times getting progressively longer, from minutes to hours, and an increase in "Unable to lock row" errors in your logs. You may also notice your Salesforce API usage spiking unexpectedly, or your team may start complaining about stale data in your applications, indicating significant delays between when data is changed in Salesforce and when it appears in your Postgres database.
How does Stacksync prevent hitting Salesforce API limits?
Stacksync uses a feature called Smart API Rate Limits. Instead of sending requests as fast as possible until an API limit is hit, our platform intelligently monitors your usage and Salesforce's shifting limits. It automatically paces and batches API calls to maximize throughput without crossing the quota thresholds. This adaptive approach ensures your syncs run smoothly and reliably, even during periods of high data activity.
Is Stacksync only for Salesforce and Postgres?
No, while Stacksync is an excellent replacement for Heroku Connect's Salesforce-to-Postgres sync, its capabilities extend much further. It is a comprehensive data integration platform that supports real-time, two-way synchronization between a wide range of systems, including other CRMs like HubSpot, various ERPs, and multiple SQL and NoSQL databases. This allows you to unify data across your entire tech stack, not just one connection.
What's the main difference between Heroku Connect's polling and Stacksync's event-driven sync?
The main difference is speed and efficiency. Heroku Connect uses polling, meaning it checks for changes on a schedule, typically every 10 minutes. This creates a minimum 10-minute delay. Stacksync uses an event-driven approach, which means it listens for changes in real time. The moment a record is updated, Stacksync captures the event and initiates the sync, transferring data in milliseconds for truly live data integration.
How much effort is it to migrate from Heroku Connect to Stacksync?
Migrating is designed to be a straightforward process. Stacksync offers a no-code setup that allows you to configure your syncs through an intuitive visual interface. Our team provides white-glove onboarding to guide you through mapping your objects and fields, ensuring a seamless transition. For most users, the initial setup can be completed in hours, not weeks, without requiring extensive engineering resources.