/
Data engineering

ETL Tools Showdown: Stacksync vs Batch-Only Platforms in 2025

Discover the 2025 ETL tools showdown: Why Stacksync's real-time bi-directional sync outperforms 25 batch-only platforms for operational efficiency.

ETL Tools Showdown: Stacksync vs Batch-Only Platforms in 2025

Real-time data integration empowers organizations to make decisions faster by providing immediate access to live information. Unlike traditional methods which rely on delayed batch processing, real-time data ensures organizations always have the latest insights, eliminating silos and providing a complete view of operations.

True bi-directional sync eliminates data silos which represent significant technical liability. This level of performance allows businesses to automate time-sensitive workflows where a change in customer subscription status can instantly trigger provisioning or de-provisioning actions in other systems.

Real-time integration provides instantaneous access to critical data, enabling organizations to make informed decisions in the moment, driving agility and responsiveness while enhancing customer experience and optimizing operational efficiency by eliminating latency in data availability.

26 Best ETL and Real-Time Integration Platforms in 2025

1. Stacksync

The Purpose-Built Real-Time Synchronization Platform

Stacksync is an integration platform engineered specifically for real-time, bi-directional synchronization between CRMs, ERPs, databases, and other operational systems, designed to eliminate integration complexity and provide a reliable, scalable data backbone for business. Unlike traditional ETL platforms that introduce operational latency, Stacksync delivers genuine real-time bidirectional CRM sync with sub-second latency, with purpose-built architecture focused specifically on operational data consistency rather than general integration.

Advanced Technical Architecture

True Bi-Directional Synchronization Engine: Stacksync provides a data exchange mechanism that ensures consistent and real-time data synchronisation between two or more independent software systems, enabling seamless automated two-way communication where changes made in one system are reflected accurately in others. Bi-directional synchronization maintains data consistency between systems by automatically propagating changes in real-time regardless of where the change originates, with intelligent conflict resolution ensuring a single, unified source of truth.

Field-Level Change Detection and Conflict Resolution: Stacksync features field-level change detection that triggers actions based on specific field changes rather than just record updates, built specifically for two-way synchronization rather than adapting one-way patterns. The platform utilizes a sophisticated sync engine providing true two-way data flow with built-in conflict resolution and error handling, with automated rules for handling simultaneous record updates gracefully.

Database-Centric Integration Approach: Stacksync allows developers to interact with business systems through familiar database interfaces, delivering superior results for real-time bidirectional synchronization between CRMs, ERPs, and databases compared to general-purpose integration platforms.

200+ Enterprise-Grade Connectors: Comprehensive connectivity spans CRMs (Salesforce, HubSpot, Attio), ERPs (NetSuite, SAP, Dynamics 365), databases (PostgreSQL, MySQL, MongoDB), data warehouses (Snowflake, BigQuery, Databricks), and specialized business applications.

No-Code Implementation with Pro-Code Flexibility: With over 200 pre-built connectors, Stacksync simplifies integration for non-technical users through an intuitive interface that allows teams to set up syncs without writing code, while providing advanced configuration options for technical teams requiring custom logic.

Enterprise Security and Compliance

SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, HIPAA BAA, ISO 27001, and CCPA compliance ensures enterprise-ready security standards. Advanced features include field-level encryption, VPC peering, processing region selection, and comprehensive access controls with SSO/SCIM integration.

Operational Performance Advantages

Stacksync dramatically outperforms competitors in implementation speed and resource requirements, with customer examples demonstrating that even complex integrations can be set up in minutes using Stacksync's intuitive interface, compared to weeks or months for traditional approaches.

Stacksync provides real-time, bi-directional sync that eliminates the need for engineering teams to build or maintain complex integration infrastructure, with over 200 pre-built connectors allowing for no-code setup deployed in minutes, with architecture purpose-built to handle high-volume data with smart API rate limit management and guaranteed data consistency.

Pricing Structure

  • Starter Plan ($1,000/month): 1 Active Sync, 50k records, 5 workflows
  • Pro Plan ($3,000/month): 3 Active Syncs, 1M records, 25 workflows, enterprise compliance
  • Enterprise Plan (Custom): Unlimited syncs, custom volumes, dedicated support, SLAs

Usage-based scaling: $8/thousand (50k-150k records), decreasing to $0.10/thousand (100M+ records), optimizing cost-effectiveness for growing data volumes.

2. Airbyte

Airbyte provides an extensive open-source data integration platform with 550+ pre-built connectors. While comprehensive in scope, Airbyte operates primarily through batch processing that introduces operational latency, making it more suitable for analytics workloads than real-time operational synchronization.

Technical Limitation: Batch-oriented architecture creates synchronization delays unsuitable for mission-critical operational processes requiring real-time data consistency.

Pricing: Open-source foundation with cloud and enterprise plans based on data volume requirements.

3. Meltano

Meltano delivers an open-source ELT framework emphasizing developer control and customization. The platform requires substantial technical expertise for implementation and operates through scheduled batch processes rather than real-time synchronization.

Technical Limitation: Batch processing model and technical complexity restrict applicability for organizations requiring immediate operational data consistency.

Pricing: Free open-source licensing.

4. Matillion

Matillion specializes in cloud-native ETL optimized for data warehouse platforms. The platform excels in analytics transformations but operates in batch mode with processing cycles that prevent real-time operational effectiveness.

Technical Limitation: Analytics focus and batch processing delays make Matillion unsuitable for operational systems requiring immediate data synchronization.

Pricing: Plans start at $1,000/month.

5. Fivetran

Fivetran automates data pipeline management for analytics use cases. Despite reliable batch synchronization capabilities, the platform introduces latency that eliminates its effectiveness for operational scenarios requiring real-time consistency.

Technical Limitation: Analytics-oriented batch processing creates operational blind spots unacceptable for real-time business processes.

Pricing: Usage-based Monthly Active Rows (MAR) pricing with free starter plans.

6. Stitch

Stitch focuses on simplified ETL for small organizations. While offering straightforward setup, the platform's limited transformation capabilities and batch-only processing restrict applicability for complex operational integration requirements.

Technical Limitation: Batch processing and feature limitations prevent effective operational system synchronization.

Pricing: Plans start at $100/month for 5 million rows.

7. Apache Airflow

Apache Airflow serves as a workflow orchestration platform requiring substantial development expertise. While powerful for complex batch processes, Airflow demands custom coding and operates through scheduled execution rather than real-time synchronization.

Technical Limitation: Development-intensive implementation and batch scheduling prevent real-time operational synchronization.

Pricing: Free open-source with infrastructure costs.

8. Integrate.io

Integrate.io provides low-code iPaaS capabilities for basic integration scenarios. The platform lacks advanced bi-directional synchronization and real-time capabilities required for mission-critical operational processes.

Technical Limitation: Limited real-time capabilities and basic feature set restrict operational effectiveness.

Pricing: Custom pricing based on requirements.

9. Oracle Data Integrator

Oracle Data Integrator delivers enterprise ETL with deep Oracle ecosystem integration. The platform provides sophisticated batch processing but operates with traditional ETL latency that limits real-time operational effectiveness.

Technical Limitation: Batch-oriented architecture prevents real-time operational synchronization across diverse systems.

Pricing: Per-OCPU consumption pricing.

10. IBM InfoSphere DataStage

IBM InfoSphere DataStage handles large-scale transformation workloads through parallel processing. Despite sophisticated capabilities, the platform's batch-oriented architecture introduces operational latency inconsistent with modern business requirements.

Technical Limitation: Enterprise batch processing model creates delays unacceptable for real-time operational requirements.

Pricing: Starting at $1.75 per Capacity Unit-Hour.

11. AWS Glue

AWS Glue provides serverless ETL within the AWS ecosystem. While cost-effective for analytics, Glue's batch processing and AWS-specific focus limit effectiveness for real-time operational synchronization across diverse platforms.

Technical Limitation: Batch processing model and AWS ecosystem lock-in prevent real-time operational synchronization.

Pricing: Pay-per-use starting at $0.44 per DPU hour.

12. Azure Data Factory

Azure Data Factory delivers cloud ETL within the Microsoft ecosystem. The platform provides reliable batch processing but operates with traditional latency that prevents real-time operational synchronization.

Technical Limitation: Batch processing architecture and Microsoft ecosystem focus restrict real-time capabilities.

Pricing: Usage-based pricing by execution time and data volume.

13. Dataddo

Dataddo specializes in marketing analytics integration with 300+ connectors. While effective for analytics workflows, the platform's batch processing and marketing focus limit operational synchronization capabilities.

Technical Limitation: Analytics-oriented batch processing prevents real-time operational system synchronization.

Pricing: Plans start at $99/month with free tier.

14. Informatica

Informatica provides comprehensive enterprise data management with advanced governance features. Despite sophisticated capabilities, the platform's complexity and batch-oriented architecture require substantial implementation resources while introducing operational latency.

Technical Limitation: Enterprise complexity and batch processing model create implementation overhead and operational delays.

Pricing: Custom enterprise pricing.

15. Qlik

Qlik combines data integration with business intelligence, emphasizing analytics over operational synchronization. While providing some real-time features for dashboards, Qlik's primary focus limits bi-directional operational system effectiveness.

Technical Limitation: Analytics focus and limited operational synchronization capabilities restrict real-time effectiveness.

Pricing: Custom pricing based on requirements.

16. Skyvia

Skyvia provides cloud-based integration with bi-directional capabilities. While offering some real-time features, the platform's processing approach and limited enterprise functionality restrict large-scale operational effectiveness.

Technical Limitation: Processing limitations and feature constraints restrict enterprise operational synchronization.

Pricing: Free plan with paid plans starting at $79/month.

17. Estuary

Estuary focuses on real-time streaming architectures bridging batch and streaming requirements. Despite real-time capabilities, the platform's complexity and specialized focus limit accessibility for straightforward operational synchronization needs.

Technical Limitation: Architectural complexity restricts accessibility for organizations requiring straightforward operational synchronization.

Pricing: Usage-based starting at $0.50/GB with free plan.

18. Singer

Singer provides an open-source framework for building data pipelines rather than a complete platform. The framework demands substantial development expertise and custom implementation that many organizations cannot dedicate to integration infrastructure.

Technical Limitation: Development-intensive framework approach requires extensive technical resources for implementation.

Pricing: Free open-source with development costs.

19. Keboola

Keboola offers multi-functional ETL with drag-and-drop interfaces. While providing some real-time features, the platform's processing approach and complexity limit effectiveness for straightforward operational synchronization requirements.

Technical Limitation: Platform complexity and processing limitations restrict operational synchronization effectiveness.

Pricing: Free plan with usage limitations.

20. Apache Kafka

Apache Kafka serves as a distributed streaming platform handling high-volume real-time data. While powerful for streaming architectures, Kafka requires substantial development expertise and infrastructure management that exceeds most organizations' integration requirements.

Technical Limitation: Streaming platform complexity and development requirements restrict accessibility for operational synchronization.

Pricing: Free open-source with infrastructure costs.

21. Rivery

Rivery provides comprehensive ETL capabilities with workflow automation. Despite advanced features, the platform operates primarily through batch processing that introduces operational latency unsuitable for real-time synchronization requirements.

Technical Limitation: Batch processing architecture creates operational delays preventing real-time synchronization.

Pricing: Starting at $0.75/RPU credit.

22. Talend

Talend offers comprehensive data integration across on-premises, cloud, and hybrid environments. While feature-rich, the platform's complexity and batch-oriented processing create implementation overhead while introducing operational latency.

Technical Limitation: Enterprise complexity and batch processing prevent efficient real-time operational synchronization.

Pricing: Custom enterprise quote.

23. Hevo Data

Technical Limitation: Batch processing model and limited real-time features restrict operational synchronization capabilities.
Pricing: Free tier; paid from $239/month; custom enterprise.

24. Pentaho Data Integration (PDI)

PDI offers visual ETL and BI-suite alignment. Strong for curated analytics pipelines; not built for sub-second, conflict-aware write-back across business apps.
Technical Limitation: Limited real-time; batch-first architecture.
Pricing: Community (free), Enterprise (quote).

25. Portable

Long-tail connector specialist with fixed pricing and fast custom connector delivery. Great for getting niche SaaS data into warehouses.
Technical Limitation: One-way ELT; no true bi-directional operational sync.
Pricing: Free manual syncs; scheduled from $200/month.

26. SQL Server Integration Services (SSIS)

Microsoft-native ETL with robust transformations and control flows. Excellent for SQL Server shops running batch workloads.
Technical Limitation: Batch-oriented; no native real-time, conflict-aware two-way sync.
Pricing: Included with SQL Server licensing.

Stacksync vs Batch-Only: What Actually Changes in Ops?

With batch ETL/ELT

  • Decisions run on stale data (minutes/hours).
  • Reverse-ETL write-backs lack conflict policies; risk loops and thrash.
  • Engineering owns fragile glue code, replays, and reconciliation.

With Stacksync (sync-first)

  • Sub-second, bi-directional propagation across CRM/ERP/DB.
  • Field-level conflict rules (source-of-truth per field, idempotency, replay).
  • No-code setup + 200+ connectors; SSO/SCIM, SOC 2, GDPR, HIPAA.

Quick Chooser

  • Need live, two-way consistency between Salesforce ↔ NetSuite ↔ Postgres/Snowflake? → Stacksync.
  • Need analytics to warehouse with minimal ops? → Fivetran / Hevo / Airbyte / Portable.io.
  • Need orchestration only? → Airflow.
  • Cloud-native ETL inside a single cloud? → Glue / ADF / Dataflow.

Bottom Line

Batch ETL still powers analytics, but it can’t keep operational systems in lockstep. If revenue, SLAs, and customer experience depend on current records everywhere, pair your warehouse pipelines with a real-time, bi-directional synchronization layer. Start with one golden object, define field ownership + conflict rules, and pilot Stacksync to cut reconciliation work and latency—then scale across the stack.